|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Back to governors pages Back to classes Conclusions & results from the children's Questionnaire 2009
Children's
Questionnaire Rationale
Over
recent years, a wealth of evidence has supported the benefits of
consulting the young people in The annual children’s questionnaire enables children's voice to be an active part in school development and evaluation process. This was appreciated and commented on in the OFSTED.
The
children’s consultation ensures all children are true partners in
learning.
In
Spring 2009 as part of the whole school evaluation and development, the
annual children’s questionnaire was completed by every child present in
the school in the Foundation Stage, and Key Stage 1 (Years 1 and 2).
In Spring 2009 the annual questionnaire was administered through a questionnaire to each child present at school on one day across the whole school. Further data was collected through a “hands-up” approach to questions asked by the teachers in each class for each year group to support the questionnaire e.g. what would make playtime better. One questionnaire was given to each class. The questionnaire was divided into two parts; one section for the child to complete and a second section for the class teacher to read in order to expand on the children’s views and their understanding and collect views from a whole class discussion. This was to eliminate any peer pressure to conform with the rest of the class to raise hands and also to give each child an understanding that the school values their honest opinion and the opportunity to complete a questionnaire as a ‘grown-up’.
The
questionnaire was designed so that the section to be completed by the
child could be read by an adult and the children were asked to respond
either yes or no in most cases.
All
pupils’ views were tallied and recorded.
All
children have the right to feel safe at all times.
The questions were designed to assess children’s ideas and
opinions across all aspects of school life.
These views were then evaluated to gain an understanding of the
children’s perspective of well being and learning at
Whole
class “layered” targets were also introduced in Spring 2008 with the
aim to ensure that all children understood what they “must”,
“should” and “could” achieve and a “challenge” target was
introduced to ensure every child could experience a challenging situation.
The
children’s views on the use of targets to support their learning and
what they found easy or hard was questioned and how they recognised when a
piece of work was good, or what to do when challenge is encountered.
Playtime
is also an area which is questioned to ensure playtime is fun.
Enjoyment of playtime and how the children consider it could be
made better is asked.
Creative
Opportunities such as Fun Time Fridays and creative days are also discussed with the
children. You will need Adobe Acrobat reader to view and print these, you can download it for free if you don't have it installed on your computer.
Pupil
Voice – collecting views
Discussion with a
group of
Y2 more able children:
From the comments
above, it is apparent that these more able Y2 children strongly recognise
that a quiet classroom enables them to achieve, promotes concentration and
the ability to achieve higher.
Talking in the classroom is consistently seen as a
barrier to their learning.
These
children resent children talking but also dislike talking by the teacher
due to children being told off.
Bad
behaviour is seen as disruptive by this group of more able children and is
obviously seen as a barrier to their learning.
‘Good’
lessons are ones where the work is new and exciting and the teacher is
able to explain and enable the child to understand new challenges.
The use of targets promotes independent learning. A target is seen as a learning tool which enables the children to see their next steps in learning and ensures a challenging learning environment.
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||